Papers (1): Philosophy of Science & Science Studies

PAPERS IN PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AND SCIENCE STUDIES

The Radical Naturalism of Naturalistic Philosophy of Science,” forthcoming in Topoi, special issue on naturalism.

Epistemic Risk, Scientific Significance, and Conceptual Normativity,” presented to 7th Biennial Meeting of the Society for the Philosophy of Science in Practice, Ghent, Belgium, June 2018.

Beyond Realism and Anti-Realism—At Last?Spontaneous Generations 9 (2018): 46-51.

Articulating the World: Experimental Practice and Conceptual Understanding,” in Bas van Fraassen and Isabelle Peschard, eds., The Experimental Side of Modeling, University of Minnesota Press, 2018, 94-117.

Laws, Scientific Practice, and the Contingency/Inevitability Question,” in Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, and Andrew Pickering, ed., Science as It Could Have Been, University of Pittsburgh Press, 2016, 317-331.

The Conceptual and Ethical Normativity of Intra-Active Phenomena“, http://dx.doi.org/10.20415/rhiz/030.e01 . Rhizomes 30 (2016).

Scientific Practices and the Scientific Image” in Léna Soler et al., ed.., Rethinking Science After the Practice Turn, Routledge, 2014, 277-294.

Recovering Thomas Kuhn“, Topoi 32 (1), 2013, 59-64.

Articulating the World: Experimental Systems and Conceptual Understanding“, International Studies in Philosophy of Science 25 (2011): 243-254.

Philosophy of Science and Science Studies in the West:  An Unrecognized Synthesis,”East Asian Science and Technology Studies 5 (2011): 11-27; issue on STS in East Asia

Why Write Histories of Science? History of the Human Sciences 23 (4), 2010, pp. 100-104

Standpoint Theories Reconsidered,” Hypatia 24 (2009): 244-252, in symposium on feminist standpoint theory

Laboratory Fictions,” in M. Suarez, ed., Fiction in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization, New York, Routledge, 2008, 37-55.

Naturalism and Scientific Practices: A Concluding Scientific Postscript,” in Chienkuo Michael Mi and Ruey-lin Chen, eds., Naturalized Epistemology and Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2007, 61-86.

Epistemological Derangement,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36 (2005): 835-847 (essay review of John Zammito, A Nice Derangement of Epistemes).

Barad’s Feminist Naturalism,” Hypatia 19 (2004), 142-161.

Kuhn’s Philosophy of Scientific Practice,” in T. Nickles, ed., Thomas Kuhn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002, 101-21.

Kuhn and Scientific Practices,” Configurations 6 (1998), 33-51.

Vampires: Social Constructivism, Realism, and Other Philosophical Undead,” History and Theory 41 (February 2002), 60-78.

Cultural Studies of Science,” International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2001, 3125-27.

Should We Still Ask the Question that Scientific Realism Would Answer?,” Modern Schoolman 71, January/March 1999, 29-32.

Understanding Scientific Practices: Cultural Studies of Science as a Philosophical Program,” in M. Biagioli, ed., Science Studies Reader, New York: Routledge, 1999, 442-56.

New Philosophies of Science in North America–Twenty Years Later,” Zeitschrift für allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (1998), 73-124.

The Narrative Reconstruction of Science,” Inquiry 33 (1990):179-96.